Everything about Spurious Relationship totally explained
In
statistics, a
spurious relationship (or, sometimes,
spurious correlation) is a
mathematical relationship in which two occurrences have no causal connection, yet it may be inferred that they do, due to a certain third, unseen factor (referred to as a "confounding factor" or "
lurking variable"). The spurious relationship gives an impression of a worthy link between two groups that's invalid when objectively examined.
The misleading correlation between two variables is produced through the operation of a third causal variable. In other words we find a correlation between A and B. So we've three possible relationships:
» A causes B,
B causes A,
» OR
C causes both A and B.
The last is a spurious correlation. It is therefore often said that "
Correlation doesn't imply causation".
General example
An example of a spurious relationship can be illuminated examining a city's
ice cream sales. These sales are highest when the rate of drownings in city
swimming pools is highest. To allege that ice cream sales cause drowning, or vice-versa, would be to imply a spurious relationship between the two. In reality, a
heat wave may have caused both. The heat wave is an example of a hidden or unseen variable.
Another popular example is a series of Dutch statistics showing a positive correlation between the number of storks nesting in a series of springs and the number of human babies born at that time. Of course there was no causal connection; they were correlated with each other only because they were correlated with the weather nine months before the observations.
Experiments
The term is commonly used in
statistics and in particular in
experimental research techniques. Experimental research attempts to understand and predict causal relationships (X → Y). A non-causal correlation can be spuriously created by an antecedent which causes both (W → X & Y). Intervening variables (X → W → Y), if undetected, may make indirect causation look direct. Because of this, experimentally identified
correlations don't represent
causal relationships unless spurious relationships can be ruled out.
In practice, three conditions must be met in order to conclude that X causes Y, directly or indirectly:
- X must precede Y
- Y must not occur when X doesn't occur
- Y must occur whenever X occurs
Spurious relationships can often be identified by considering whether any of these three conditions have been violated.
The final condition may be relaxed in the case of indirect causation. For example, consider a pistol
duel. Two men face off and fire at each other. If one man dies as a result of the other man's shot, we can rightly conclude that the other man caused his death. However, if a doctor saves the wounded man's life (thus violating the third premise), this doesn't undermine causation, only
direct causation. The biological damage (W) sustained from the shot (X) causes death (Y), not the shot itself, allowing medical intervention.
Further Information
Get more info on 'Spurious Relationship'.
|
External Link Exchanges
Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:
<a href="http://spurious_relationship.totallyexplained.com">Spurious relationship Totally Explained</a>
Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned. |
